The platform

A process engine, not a catalogue of templates.

In the analyst vocabulary, Dexon BPM belongs to the business orchestration and automation market — what Everest calls process orchestration and QKS calls an iBPMS. Most enterprise tools are products built around a fixed set of templates: you configure within what the vendor anticipated. Dexon BPM differs at the base — the boundary of what you can change is not what someone foresaw, but whatever can be modelled as a process.

The structural difference

The first configuration is quoted. The next two hundred are not.

You will keep the tool you choose today for five years, and in five years your structure, your services, your suppliers and the regulation governing you will all change. Each of those changes will be either a configuration your team makes in an afternoon, or a request to the vendor with a quote and a schedule.

A closed toolA process engine
What can be changedWhatever the vendor anticipated someone would want to changeWhatever can be modelled as a process
If you need something unforeseenA request, a quote, a schedule — or waiting for the roadmapIt is modelled and published
Who does itThe vendor or a certified partnerYour team, from the browser
At the next updateCustom development must be retestedConfiguration survives

Three questions worth asking any vendor, ourselves included: Can my team change it without you? Is that configuration or development? Does it survive the next update?

Licensing

End users are not licensed

You license the base module and the management users — those who handle and operate. Your entire workforce, the other companies in the group and the third parties taking part in a case can all use the platform at no incremental cost.

The paradox worth checking with any vendor: if your goal is to increase self-service — that is, more people using the platform — then under a named or active user model, meeting that goal raises your bill. And that does not show up in the year-one proposal: it shows up at the year-three renewal.

Deployment models

SaaS on Dexon cloudOn Microsoft Azure, single-tenant: dedicated database, application services, VPN and firewall per client.
SaaS on your infrastructureThe same managed service, operating inside the perimeter your security team already controls.
Perpetual licenceOn-premise, with an annual support and updates contract. Operations stay on your own infrastructure.

The engine's proof

Dexon ServiceDesk is an implementation of the ITIL processes on Dexon BPM.

It is not a different product: it is a configuration. The ITIL processes are content on the engine, which is why an external auditor was able to certify them across twelve areas.

That is the most economical demonstration of our whole thesis. If the engine can carry an audited service desk, it can carry procurement, hiring, supplier management or any process with forms, approvals, deadlines and evidence.

See the twelve certified processes →

The boundary, declared

What we do not claim

LLM-based agentic automation in production. The methodology already defines the agent as an executor class — bounded scope, escalation criteria, evidence per intervention — and that is the framework our agent capabilities are being built into.

Process mining discovery over external event logs. Every process produces a native event log, exportable to the mining tool of your choice; discovery over systems we do not run is your mining tool's job.

A general-purpose app builder. The engine builds and runs governed processes with their forms, rules, data and integrations; if what you need is an arbitrary application with no process behind it, other tools fit better.

Test what it costs to change it

Pick one of your processes, with its real rules and its awkward exceptions. We configure it with you, live, so your team sees the true cost of a change — not just how the platform looks once configured.

Book a technical session